|
February 2, 2005 - Social Security has for nearly
70 years provided a predictable, guaranteed benefit to millions of
older and disabled workers and their survivors. This benefit,
funded exclusively by Social Security payroll taxes paid by workers and
their employers, is one that can and should be safeguarded for
generations to come.
The Bush administration claims that radical changes to Social Security,
including privatization, are necessary to maintain the solvency of this
program. Significant changes to a program of such consequence
require and, indeed, demand informed discussion and should not be
reduced to sound bites, platitudes or scare tactics.
In truth, Social Security is not headed for disaster, but many people
agree that modest steps should be taken to maintain the integrity of
this program upon which millions of current and future beneficiaries
rely. However, the financial strain privatization would impose
upon the Social Security program would pose serious and long-lasting
perils to the stability of this tremendously successful program.
Privatizing Social Security would add $2 trillion to the already
runaway federal deficit. The Bush administration’s proposed
changes to Social Security will do nothing to enhance this program’s
solvency. In fact, in order to restore solvency to a privatized
Social Security program, younger workers’ benefits would have to be cut
by 26-45 percent – a prospect that is totally unacceptable.
Analyses of privatization proposals show that younger workers will get
hit twice: once with a reduction in Social Security benefits and again
with the burden they will be forced to carry to pay off the grossly
expanding federal debt.
Popular assumptions that Social Security will “run out” before younger
workers can collect the benefits they have earned are not supported by
reality. Social Security taxes to be collected and money owed to
the Social Security system are adequate to allow full benefits to be
paid until 2042. Additional modest adjustments would further
stabilize this important program.
Privatizing Social Security and reducing benefits would jeopardize not
only younger workers’ long-term retirement benefits, but also the
disability and survivor benefits provided by this program.
Thirteen million Americans currently rely upon such benefits, and it is
safe to assume that few of them ever anticipated needing this
life-saving benefit.
Privatizing Social Security will unnecessarily destabilize a program
that has allowed hundreds of millions of Americans to live with dignity
and security. The administration’s current proposals would weaken
the program and undermine its long-term financial stability. We
will work with members of Congress, as well as with the labor movement
and other allies, to strengthen Social Security to ensure that it will
provide its promised benefits for generations to come. Workers
have earned this benefit by paying into it over time and they should
not be guinea pigs for a flawed social experiment.
|